|
Bridge History - Progression of Citizen Concern
At first, citizens did not
pay much attention to the routes on the Collin County mobility plan.
They were just lines.
In 2002,
there were multiple dotted lines drawn across Lavon Lake in the CC
Mobility Plan. There was not too much worry because there was no
specific line, just a bunch of dotted lines. This map was part of the
2006 Mobility Plan Update.

In August
2006,
the CC Mobility Plan was updated to a single path. Mr. Delgado told us
that they drew this route across the map without the benefit of detailed
engineering Because they felt it was the best location.

When citizens became aware of this single path,
they were not thrilled with the idea but it made very little
logical sense. It was not taken too seriously because:
It crosses
the lake in DEEP water.
It requires two LONG bridges.
It failed to meet Corp of Engineering criteria.
Citizens who called Collin County Engineering were told that
there is no plan to take any action on this route. There is no
money. This is just a line.
In
2007 the bond package appropriated the Lavon Lake Bridge Crossing study
money, but this fact was not known to most voters:
Our citizen surveys reveal that only 5% of the people knew there was
$500,000 earmarked for a bridge study included in the 2007 bond package. Of
the few who knew bridge money was in the bond package, most thought it
was for the replacement of the old bridges. Citizens totally missed
this step in the Lavon Lake Bridge Study process.
Here is the media published prior to 2007 Bond Package:
Brochure 1 – no mention
Brochure 2 – 5 word mention
- no specific details
Info sheet - no specific details
2007 Bond Program,
Transportation Publication ,
one line mention on page 31 and 43 with no specific details.
This study represents a project that could ultimately cost the tax
payers hundreds of millions. It deserved more attention and
explanation.
Conflicting information was presented in the 2007 bond proposal
documentation. The
chart on page 43 indicates that the bridge route was to be 2 lanes,
while the maps in this same document propose 6 lanes. Citizens
were not given clear and accurate information about this
route and what the study was
going to be
Citizens became alarmed when the Commissioners voted to
spend the bond money on the bridge study and move forward:
February 23, 2009, The
Collin County Commissioner’s meeting included a heated debate over how
much to pay HNTB to do a bridge location study across Lavon Lake. The
debate was written up in the news. This is the first many of
us knew of Collin County’s route study.
When Collin County awarded HNTB
the contract for $366,000 taxpayer dollars, this changed everything. The
bridge idea went from “just a line” into a plan that was progressing in
a VERY real way.
September 14, 2009, HNTB
presented the proposed routes to the Collin County Commissioners. The
Commissioners began talk of toll bridges. Not only did it
seem Collin County had a WILL to build these bridges, but they were also
suggesting a WAY to make it happen.
October 7, 2009, Public
Meeting:
Collin County Engineering published a time line with a projected BRIDGE
COMPLETION date of 2018 - 2024. This publication gives details of a
bridge, NOT just a line. At the May 19, 2010 Public Meeting, HNTB presented the red route
as the optimum route.
As part of the study, Collin County met with various
towns and developers:
We found
"project coordination meeting" with Hunt Properties.
Hunt land
investors were being given the same privilege and regard as cities
in the lake area.
_small.jpg)
October 7, 2009, Collin County and HNTB presented map
evidence that actually defends our NO BRIDGE views:
Below are the maps HNTB and Collin County presented as argument of
the bridge project's “Need and Purpose.”

Mitzi Ward is a key member of the NCTCOG team who created these maps.
On October 7, 2009, this is the statement Ms. Ward sent to us:
“The Lavon Lake Bridge is not included in the Mobility 2030 – 2009
Amendment long-range transportation plan. Therefore, it was not
considered in this congestion analysis. The Metropolitan Transportation
Plan (MTP) is fiscally constrained to anticipated revenue sources. This
road may be in the Collin County Thoroughfare plan but the MTP does not
recognize the improvement until a funding source can be identified.”
These maps show there is NO NEED for new Lavon Lake bridges.
The 2009
Congestion Level map
shows current levels of traffic congestion, light to moderate around the
lake.
The 2030
Congestion Level (No Build) map
shows what the area would look like if all transportation plans were
stopped and no more money was ever spent on road projects. This
scenario would never happen; people would move away before
traffic becomes this bad. Also, this map has nothing to do
with the build or no build of the Lavon Lake bridges.
The 2030
Congestion Level (Build) map
shows traffic congestion that is light to moderate around the
lake. This map
shows what the traffic would look like around the lake if Collin County
DOES NOT BUILD any new bridges over Lavon. It shows that
if they stay on task and complete the other planned roadways,
like the improvements to Hwy 78 and Hwy 380, the traffic does
not worsen in the lake area.
Prior to the October 11,
2010 Public Hearing:
Collin County
officials have said that bridge is never
going to happen in our lifetime, and the agendas at the public meetings
predict a delivery date IF funding is available. County
officials say no funding is available.
The agendas also say
that the route, if adopted, is subject to revision.
The $366,000 dollars spent on the study gave citizens Public
Meetings to speak out against the route. The study also told
us that the route stands for a project that would cost $400 to $470
million in today's dollars.
This proposed route gives us more uncertainty that
continues to put the lake area in limbo as far as development.
Dropping all new bridge
routes
and shifting focus to land routes that
CAN be accomplished in our lifetime, will remove this uncertainty.
October 11, 2010 Public
Hearing
The
Commissioner's Court voted against the route and motioned to remove
the route from the mobility plan.
COLLIN COUNTY DID NOT MAKE ITS CASE FOR THIS ROUTE.
SINCE NO BRIDGE IS LIKELY TO BE BUILT ALONG THIS ROUTE, DUE TO THE
EXTREME COSTS AND NOT MEETING CORPS OF ENGINEERING CRITERIA,
THIS ROUTE WAS NOT WARRANTED.
For less than the cost
of this expensive bridge, upgrades to current plans for SH 78 and
Hwy 380 could be delivered. This would solve the lake area's
congestion where it is projected to be the worst. Upgrades to
Hwy 380 and SH 78 meet Corps criteria and can be built.
|